Subtotal, VAT, and balance due are never typed in separately — they're derived from the same engine, every time.
A payment updates the balance due immediately — no separate spreadsheet to keep in sync.
The documents your customer receives come straight from this same record.
The oldest debts sit at the top with how many days late they are — no report to run, no filter to remember.
Three different questions most systems make you ask separately: what you billed, what actually landed in the bank, and what went out.
Every card here can be swapped, reordered, or removed. The default is a starting point, not a fixed layout.
Not just a number — what was counted, what was excluded, and as at when. Here, 49 draft invoices are left out, and it says so.
Common questions are answered straight from your data, with no AI call at all. The ones that do use AI are marked.
Pick from the list, or ask in your own words. Either way the answer comes from your ledger, not a guess.
Not a generic template stretched to fit — with modules built for how different industries actually operate, from container shipments and landed cost to project-based work and site operations.
Not twenty-seven products stitched together. Every tile below reads from the same ledger, the same contacts, and the same stock — so a quotation becoming an invoice becoming a payment is one continuous record, not three systems reconciled by hand.
Live counts, not placeholders. Optional modules only appear once they're licensed.
For sites running on grid, solar, battery, and generator together, Mizo runs a real hour-by-hour dispatch simulation — not a spreadsheet with assumptions baked in.
Grid, solar, battery, and generator modelled together, with real generator cycle-charging behaviour validated against actual field deployments — not a flat capacity assumption.
Start from grid availability, load, and outage hours. Then re-optimize toward any of five objectives: maximise battery use, maximise solar use, lowest capex, lowest lifetime cost, or fastest payback.
Every project exports a Bill of Quantities as two documents: a technical BOQ with quantities only, and a commercial BOQ fully priced — because tenders frequently require sealed technical and financial envelopes.
Payback and IRR curves, a site topology diagram, and a PDF export with charts — plus an assistant that answers from that specific design's own computed numbers, not a generic guess.
This isn't a marketing claim. It's the actual rounding-consistency check, generating random invoices and verifying every one balances, running this very moment on this page.
5,000 randomly generated invoices, checked for balance to the cent.
Same check that runs against 5,000 samples in the real test suite before every release.
Most SME-tier accounting tools were built for one market and bolted onto others later. Here's what that usually means in practice.
| Capability | Typical SME-tier tool | Mizo |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-jurisdiction tax compliance | Usually one region, or a bolted-on add-on | Configures to any country's VAT, GST, or sales tax rules |
| Rounding correctness | Assumed correct | Fuzz-tested against 5,000 random invoices |
| Permission granularity | A handful of broad roles | 43 functional areas, each view/edit/approve |
| Period locking | Often missing entirely | Built in |
| Container landed-cost allocation | Rare or manual | Automatic, per shipment |
| Bring-your-own-data import | Usually a paid onboarding project | Self-serve, same day |
Start a free 14-day trial, pre-loaded with sample data — or bring your own from day one.
Start free trial